Coming soon · Flaky Test Detection for Jira

Is it a regression or just a flaky test?

Vansah Flaky Test Detection brings flakiness intelligence into Jira — alongside your requirements, defects, and delivery context — so QA teams triage faster, ship with confidence, and trust their automation again.

3.9 / 4 on the Atlassian Marketplace · 200+ happy users
Vansah signalLikely flaky.
Not a regression.
build · #4821 · main live analysis
checkout.spec › applies_promo_code
flaky
auth.spec › login_with_sso
pass
cart.spec › updates_quantity
regression
search.spec › fuzzy_match_ranking
flaky
profile.spec › avatar_upload
pass
Built on the Vansah platform — trusted by 200+ teams
ISO/IEC 27001 Certified
Atlassian Cloud Fortified
Data Residency Support

A test that passes sometimes, fails sometimes — without any real change to the product.

Same code. Same test. Different result. That's the key.

/ 01

Same code

The application logic hasn't shifted. No commit, no merge, no deploy that touched what's being tested.

/ 02

Same test

The test case itself is unchanged. No selector edits, no new assertions, no version bump.

/ 03

Different result

Yet the outcome bounces between green and red across runs. That is the key signal.

If nothing meaningful changed, but the result did — that's flakiness, not a defect.

Flakiness isn't noise. It changes how teams behave.

Teams start to distrust automation, ignore failures, and ship with less confidence. Over time, flakiness becomes a tax on delivery — paid in slower releases and quieter alarms.

  1. Slower pipelines

    Reruns, manual triage, and "wait and see" decisions stretch every release window.

  2. Wasted engineering time

    Hours lost investigating failures that aren't real regressions — work that produces nothing shippable.

  3. Lower release confidence

    Uncertainty spreads across teams and stakeholders. Sign-offs get cautious, releases get delayed.

  4. Bad incentives

    People add retries to "make it green" instead of fixing the root cause. The signal degrades.

The good news — flakiness is usually detectable, measurable, and manageable, if you treat it as a first-class signal.

— Vansah's working thesis

Triage faster.
Ship with conviction.

By bringing flakiness detection into Jira alongside requirements, defects, and delivery context, Vansah aims to help teams answer the question that matters most — quickly, and with evidence.

→ 01

Triage faster, fewer false alarms

Cut through the noise of intermittent failures so engineers spend their attention where it counts: real defects.

→ 02

Protect release confidence

Quarantine known unreliable tests transparently — so the green doesn't lie, and red still means something.

→ 03

Prioritize stabilization by impact

See which builds and environments concentrate flakiness, and fix the patterns — not just the symptoms.

→ 04

Trust your automation again

When failures consistently mean something, the team stops second-guessing the pipeline — and starts trusting it.

Most flakiness comes from the same handful of culprits.

Once you know the patterns, you can detect, classify, and stabilize with intent.

root cause

Timing & async issues

Hard-coded waits and race conditions. Tests that win or lose depending on which thread crosses the line first.

root cause

Environment instability

Flaky browser drivers, shared runners, network blips. The infrastructure is the variable, not the code.

root cause

Test data issues

Shared state between tests, non-deterministic inputs, leftover fixtures from a previous run.

root cause

Automation script fragility

Brittle selectors, over-specific assertions, scripts that break on any DOM cosmetic.

root cause

UI changes & selector drift

The product moved a button. The test still believes in the old world. Failure follows.

root cause

Requirement mismatch

The test expects something the product no longer guarantees. The contract changed but the assertion didn't.

Did the failure happen without any meaningful change?

When a test fails, work through these five questions before you spend an engineer's afternoon on it.

01
Did the requirement change?
no →
02
Did the test change?
no →
03
Did the build or commit change anything relevant?
no →
04
Did the environment change?
no →
05
Does the failure pattern repeat intermittently across runs?
yes →

You're likely dealing with flakiness.

The signals point away from a real regression. Quarantine, investigate the pattern, and stabilize — don't ship a panic fix.

Coming soon

Vansah identifies unreliable tests where your work already lives.

By analyzing execution history, Jira changes, test versions, builds, and environments, Vansah highlights which failures are likely real defects versus flaky test behavior — directly inside Jira, alongside Vansah's existing AI-powered test management.

We avoid absolute claims. Instead of saying "no requirement has changed," Vansah surfaces auditable signals — so your team can verify the verdict, not just trust it.

Request a Demo
VANSAH SIGNAL · TEST-2418
open in Jira
Linked requirement
No recent changes detected in PROJ-1284 acceptance criteria.
Test case version
Unchanged for 14 days — last edit by @maria, unrelated assertion.
Build & commit
No code path changes touching this feature in builds #4818–#4821.
Environment pattern
Failures concentrated on chrome-runner-3. Other envs: 100% pass.
Likely flaky behavior, not a regression — concentrated on a single runner with intermittent timing failures.

Stop guessing. Start knowing which failures are real.

See how Vansah identifies unreliable tests inside Jira — alongside your requirements, defects, and delivery context — and helps your team triage faster with confidence.

Request a Demo
3.9 / 4 · trusted by 200+ Atlassian Marketplace teams